Take a look at this summary report from the CMS. It will open in a new window. Basically from Oct 2009 to Mar 2011 the RACs have recovered $365.8M. Of that over half was collected from Jan 2011 to Mar 2011. Things are speeding up. There has been, and still is, a learning curve going [...]
Continue Reading
Brace yourself and get ready for a rough ride. For over a year now, whenever the subject of medical necessity has been raised, the standard response from CMS has been “medical necessity is not being reviewed at the present time”, or close variations thereof. “At the present time” gave goosebumps to those who follow the RAC auditing program closely. The other shoe would fall, we just didn’t know when.
Continue Reading
by Winston on August 11, 2010
in RAC News
On July 28, 2010, a U.S. District Court in the Southern District of California rendered a decision of monumental significance to all providers who may consider challenging a RAC Contractor for violating the law. The original lawsuit, filed by Palomar Medical Center on March 24, 2009, was the first lawsuit filed against a RAC. The regulation is not complicated on this issue. (Pss … Judge Benitez – Your Honor – didn’t you check out the CMS website? No? You never heard of it? Umm … Sir, that would be the “official government website” that spells out the regulations all providers have to live by.)
Continue Reading